Long Road To The Future

sabotage

narakinomoto — Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:00:20 +0000

Brian Martin, Nonviolence versus Capitalism (London: War Resisters’ International, 2001) 8 Sabotage A blast furnace operator at a steel mill purposely makes a slight slipup, causing a cold shut-down. An ex-employee cuts telephone cables serving half a million people. A plumber puts small nails in the pipes of a new building. A computer programmer deletes all copies of data on a computer system. An anti-tobacco activist creatively disfigures and rewrites a billboard advertising cigarettes. A member of Ploughshares uses a hammer to dent the nosecone of a nuclear missile.1 A forest activist surreptitiously pulls up survey stakes put in by a logging company. An environmental activist pours sand into the fuel tank of a bulldozer. An animal liberationist torches a laboratory used for animal experiments. These are all examples of sabotage, which can be thought of as purposeful action to damage, destroy or displace physical objects in order to achieve a social objective.2 There is a long history of sabotage by workers, for example to obtain a break by forcing a halt to a relentless assembly line. Nonworkers can “disrupt production”— in other words interrupt business as usual—in a wider sense by a range of actions against physical objects. In the workplace, sabotage as a strategy is commonly portrayed as resisting progress. In the late 1700s and early 1800s in Britain, in the dawn of the industrial revolution, the livelihoods of cottage workers using handlooms were threatened by mechanised looms in factories. Some of them responded by smashing the factory machinery. Inspired by the example of leader Ned Ludd, these workers were called Luddites. Since then, “Luddite” has been turned into a term of derision, treated as synonymous with opposing progress. However, this is a rewriting of history by the victors: the capitalists. The Luddites were not just machine-smashers; they were campaigning for a system that provided satisfying work and income, a system which had come under attack by the capitalist factory 134 Nonviolence versus capitalism system, which in the early years obtained higher output only through severe exploitation of employees. Sabotage has only occasionally been an organised workers’ strategy. There are a few who argue for this approach, notably David F. Noble in his book Progress Without People: In Defense of Luddism. He sees capitalism as a struggle between capital and workers in which capital has all the weapons and workers are not even in the fight. In his own words: “There is a war on, but only one side is armed: this is the essence of the technology question today. On the one side is private capital, scientized and subsidized, mobile and global, and now heavily armed with military spawned command, control, and communication technologies.”3 On the other side, workers are in disarray. Noble argues that the way workplace technologies are constructed reflects the capitalist system of power and, once constructed, these technologies help perpetuate capitalism.4 For example, the assembly line subordinates workers to the pace and tasks set by the line, reducing their opportunities to exercise autonomous judgement and to design and run the production process themselves. This is compatible with Gandhi’s analysis of mechanised textile production, which subordinates workers, compared to the hand-spun cloth khadi, whose production meshes with community self-reliance. It can be said, in short, that certain technologies embody capitalist social relations. Capitalists choose or design machinery to serve their purposes, and in practice the machinery gives owners and managers power over workers. Analysis of the role of technology in capitalism is one thing. How to challenge this is another. Noble observes that smashing the machines is one response by workers.5 But is it effective? From a nonviolence point of view, sabotage falls into a borderline category. Nonviolent action always means no physical violence against humans. Sabotage can be interpreted as physical violence against physical objects. The type of sabotage of interest here involves no direct harm to humans.6 We can only be concerned with direct harm, since indirect harm is possible with any sort of nonviolent action. A boycott can lead to a business going bankrupt, a far more serious harm than a few broken windows. Among nonviolent activists, there are different attitudes to sabotage. Some, taking a strong line against any form of physical Sabotage 135 violence, would rule out sabotage altogether. Others think it is fully legitimate, while an intermediate position is that it depends on the circumstances. It is worth keeping in mind that people do not always mean the same thing by the word “violence.” In the early 1970s, a group of researchers investigated attitudes to violence by surveying over 1000 US men. Among their revealing findings were that more than half the men thought that burning draft cards was violence and more than half thought that police shooting looters was not violence. The researchers concluded that “American men tend to define acts of dissent as ‘violence’ when they perceived the dissenters as undesirable people.”7 In other words, many of the US men used the label “violent” when they thought something was bad and “nonviolent” when they thought it was good. In contrast, from a nonviolence viewpoint burning draft cards is a form of sabotage—destroying physical objects—and of course shooting someone is definitely a form of violence. Another way of defining sabotage is as violence against property. This definition highlights ownership rights under capitalism, since nearly every physical object is owned by someone or something, whether individual, corporation or government. Many people see violence against property as more despicable than violence against humans. There may be significant cultural as well as individual variations in the way people respond to sabotage, as indeed in the way that they respond to nonviolent actions such as strikes and fasts. Responses will also vary greatly depending on what the sabotage involves. A giant explosion wiping out a shipping terminal is quite a different thing from deletion of a computer file, which affects only a few atoms. Yet if the computer file is of crucial importance—for example, a list of labour activists targeted for impending arrest—its destruction may have a greater impact than the destruction of the terminal. Sabotage is a method and so cannot be assessed in total independence from the goal of an action or campaign. If the goal is improved wages and conditions, with little fundamental challenge to capitalism, then use of sabotage is unlikely to make the challenge any greater. What is possible, though, is to look at how a nonviolent campaign is altered by use of sabotage. 136 Nonviolence versus capitalism 1. Does the campaign help to • undermine the violent underpinnings of capitalism, or • undermine the legitimacy of capitalism, or • build a nonviolent alternative to capitalism? In principle, sabotage can contribute to any of these. Whether sabotage adds to or subtracts from the campaign depends greatly on the circumstances, including cultural attitudes to the particular action taken. In some countries, property is seen as so sacred that any form of obstruction or damage is vehemently condemned. Owners of a shopping mall might be just as outraged by protesters handing out leaflets in the mall as by graffiti on shop windows. A key element here is the attitude of third parties: those observing the action, whether directly or through reports, including the media. Damage to property can evoke incredibly hostile attitudes. But again, does this mean the campaign is less effective, for example in undermining capitalism’s legitimacy? That depends. No hard and fast conclusions can be drawn on this point. 2. Is the campaign participatory? Many types of sabotage, because they are dangerous and because they would be blocked if opponents knew about them in advance, must be planned in secret. If environmentalists announced they were going to put sand in fuel tanks or spikes in trees, they would be intercepted and probably arrested before succeeding. Many types of sabotage are kept secret from beginning to end, with no admissions afterwards. Participation in these sorts of actions is very limited, typically with no more than a few people involved. Ploughshares actions are direct disarmament, such as damage to weapons systems, principally as a form of symbolic protest, though sometimes the financial and logistical costs to the military are substantial. In these actions, planning is in secret but once the action is taken, the activists acknowledge their responsibility and surrender to police. In these cases, participation in the detailed planning is limited but wider involvement in support for ploughshares actions is possible, especially in court struggles. Widespread participation is not necessarily possible for any form of nonviolent action. In repressive regimes, even meetings of a few dissidents can be illegal and lead to surveillance and arrests. However, in anticapitalist struggles this level of repression is unusual, so that a Sabotage 137 high level of participation is often possible. When use of sabotage leads to a drastic reduction in participation, that is a definite negative. 3. Are the campaign’s goals built in to its methods? It is hard to imagine a nonviolent society in which sabotage is routine. If workers control the production process, then there should be no incentive to damage equipment. That means that sabotage as a method is unlikely to ever reflect the goals of a campaign. Another way to express this is to say that sabotage will seldom be a part of “living the alternative.” 4. Is the campaign resistant to cooption? At a commercial level, it is hard to imagine cooption of sabotage. Will there be firms advertising “Sabotage Services at Your Disposal” seeking to employ members of the radical environmental group Earth First!? In this direct sense, use of sabotage in a campaign is resistant to cooption. But there are other roads to cooption, notably via organised violence of the state. Sabotage is a standard military method. Bridges are blown up and power lines severed. Today, in the “information age,” militaries are deploying “information warfare,” for example by spreading computer viruses in opponents’ military information systems. In the sphere of ideas, spreading of disinformation—carefully designed false or misleading information—has long been a standard tactic. This incorporates propaganda but also includes techniques such as running clandestine radio stations that are not what they seem to be. All these techniques can be and are used against activists, who can be subject to intensive surveillance and “dirty tricks.”8 Cooption can occur when activists start “playing the game” of deception, disinformation and dirty tricks, engaging in a sort of competition in which the object is to outwit and disrupt the opponent. One of the objects in this game is to discredit the opponent and one way to do this is to make the opponent appear, correctly or falsely, to be engaged in some unsavoury activity. Police do this when they use agents to foment violence during a protest in order to discredit the organisers in the eyes of the public. One of the risks of sabotage is that nonviolent activists may start to engage in underhanded tactics. 138 Nonviolence versus capitalism At a more serious level, sabotage can be a stepping stone to violence against humans. If destroying an unoccupied boat is acceptable, what about a building that probably is unoccupied? The line between violence and nonviolence can become blurred more easily. One way to assess the risks of sabotage is to ask, would it be acceptable for the other side to use the same techniques? One of the great advantages of nonviolence is that if it is used against the “wrong people” the consequences are not so disastrous as violence: the harm from occupation of a building is far less than blowing it up and killing all the people in it. Consider the tactic of damaging weapons, such as by Ploughshares activists. Most peace activists would be most happy for anyone else to damage or destroy weapons. So destroying weapons is a technique that is not harmful if used by the other side. However, spreading a computer virus is a different story. Having computer files destroyed by a virus is never welcome and can be catastrophic for nonviolent activists as well as police and corporations. So this form of sabotage is probably less suitable as a form of nonviolent action. In principle sabotage can be considered just another method of nonviolent action but in practice it often has many disadvantages. It is much less likely to be participatory and it never incorporates goals into methods. It is open to cooption through engaging in games of deception and damage. Finally, it has an ambiguous relation to nonviolence. However, there is a risk in becoming fixated with the problems of sabotage simply because it is perceived to be a form of violence, namely “violence against property.” This alone should not be the criterion for rejecting sabotage. Every method of nonviolent action needs to be assessed for its openness to participation, ends-means compatibility and susceptibility to cooption. The circumstances have a strong effect on how methods measure up according to these criteria. The key point is that assessment of all methods should be undertaken, without automatic acceptance or rejection in advance. Finally, to be compatible with nonviolence principles, this assessment needs to be a participatory one. Sabotage 139 Notes 1 “Ploughshares” is a term generically applied to principled peace activists who, after taking direct action to damage or destroy components of the military system, then surrender themselves to police. See for example Liane Ellison Norman, Hammer of Justice: Molly Rush and the Plowshares Eight (Pittsburgh: PPI Books, 1989). 2 Pierre Dubois, Sabotage in Industry (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1979). For numerous examples see Martin Sprouse with Lydia Ely (eds.), Sabotage in the American Workplace: Anecdotes of Dissatisfaction, Mischief and Revenge (San Francisco: Pressure Drop Press, 1992). See also The Black Cat Sabotage Handbook (Eugene, OR: Graybill, n.d.) and the magazine Processed World. 3 David F. Noble, Progress Without People: In Defense of Luddism (Chicago: Charles H. Kerr, 1993), p. 1. 4 David F. Noble, America by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1977). See also David Dickson, Alternative Technology and the Politics of Technical Change (London: Fontana, 1974). 5 Noble thinks it would be presumptuous to provide a programme of action for the labour movement. He does recommend intellectual work: “In essence, if workers have begun to smash the physical machinery of domination, so responsible intellectuals must begin deliberately to smash the mental machinery of domination.” (Progress Without People, p. 51). 6 Avoidance of harm to humans is emphasised in manuals for environmental saboteurs: Dave Foreman and Bill Haywood (eds.), Ecodefense: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching (Tucson, AZ: Ned Ludd Books, 1988, second edition); Earth First! Direct Action Manual (Eugene, OR: DAM Collective, 1997). 7 Monica D. Blumenthal, Robert L. Kahn, Frank M. Andrews and Kendra B. Head, Justifying Violence: Attitudes of American Men (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1972), p. 86. 8 For excellent advice on how activists can respond to surveillance and harassment, see Brian Glick, War at Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It (Boston: South End Press, 1989).

Macam Macam Tools Analisis Desain

narakinomoto — Wed, 26 May 2010 11:31:37 +0000

Hoola…

Judul,, post gw kali ini.. mau membahas macam macam tools analisis desain, yang gw pake semenjak dari dulu pas kuliah sampe skrng kerja.. yaa.. maklum dulu kuliah di ilmu ginian, jadi otomatis mesti butuh tools analisis buat desain

Bermula dari draft kertas + pensil mekanik, desain software coretan coretan gw yang ga mungkin bisa di baca, apalagi di pahamin org lain, karena klo dah begini, gw pasti jg bakalan pusing sendiri, buat jelasi ke temen, dosen, or rekan kerja.. (okey, next time, gw scan deh,, ancur bgt soalnya)

Lanjuut….

Naah,, ini neeh,, tools yang selama ini gw andelin..

1. “Dia” , tools desain yg mirip kyk visio, tapi GPL.. kenapa gw tertarik karena Dia dah ada di repositori kalo kita install Nux ,, wktu itu gw pake Ubuntu titiknya gw lupa, sekitar taun 2006 -2007, karena ini tools pertama kali yg gw pake pas bikin skripsi,, ringan, simpel, dan rada extrim sedikit.. wkwkk.. kenangan tak terlupakan , pas gw pake “Dia” (Ayeee…..)

* Buat Informasi Lebih lanjut , silahkan ke http://projects.gnome.org/dia/

2. “Umbrello UML Modeller” , nah ini Tools open source juga masih 1 rumah sama si “Dia” , oke banget buat desain OO, gw ga bisa cerita panjang kalo tentang ini, gw make “Umbrello” ga begitu sering, jadi silahkan langsung aja ke http://uml.sourceforge.net

3. “Visio” , yoi pasti kebanyakan orang pernah denger dan pake yang satu ini,, lumayan user friendly, gw jg pake ini pas kuliah juga, mulai dari visio versi 2003 – 2010 (sekarang) gw pake juga.. gampang bgt buat pemula maupun expert, banyak perkembangannya jg neh visio,, saat gw pake “Visio” rasanya –> (Aseeek….)

(Waah.. parah Visio 2010 gw,, ngeLeeek… Kacau,, lum stabil kyk nya,, mendingan pake yg lama aja daah..)

* Buat Informasi Lebih lanjut , silahkan ke http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/visio/default.aspx

Lanjuut…!! Naah,, selanjutnya.. ini adalah tools gw pas mulai2 kerja tapi 3 tools yang di atas juga tetep dampingin , pas gw lagi butuh..

4. ” Edraw Max” , waw.. manteb neh tools, lebih berwarna, banyak item2nya, fiturnya juga buanyak, trs icon2nya,, bikin gemes… aiiih…. gw pake “Edraw Max“, pas mulai desain project di kantor, sekitar 1 setengah tahun yang lalu, rasanya simpel, Portable, dan penuh warna.. (rada sedikit berat se, tapi ga masalah..), kedepannya “Edraw Max” mungkin bisa ngalahin pasaran “Visio” , xixi…

* Buat Informasi Lebih lanjut , silahkan ke http://www.edrawsoft.com/

5. “DBDesigner 4″, pasti bingung kok DB, nah ini juga salah satu tools gw, buat desain software kalo di atas tools buat bikin diagram flow, dll . nah sekarang waktunya buat desain database, gw pake tools “DBDesigner 4″ karena selain buat desain relasi table, juga bisa langsung generet ke mysql,, hehehe.. Simple, Nyaman, dan Cepet jadi dee… jadi Progremmer bisa langsung liat realisi masing masing table pake tools ini. Diawal pasti binggung, itu waajar,, tapi lama2 pasti enak banget dee…

* Buat Informasi Lebih lanjut , silahkan ke http://www.fabforce.net/dbdesigner4/

6. “GUI Design Studio” , ini senjata gw selanjutnya. tools yang satu ini, buat desain layout, kasus bermula saat gw ngelamin kesulitan buat jelasin model desain form yang akan di bikin sama progremmer, jadinya gw cari deh tuh tools yang bener bener cocok sma kebutuhan, “GUI Design Studio” , pertamakali liat dan pake, langsung jatuh cinta, dan kelamaan, semakin tau fitur nya, makin makin jadi. sukanya bukan cuma bisa desain form, “GUI Design Studio” juga mempunyai fasilitas untuk melakukan kontrol di di form yang lu desain, udah gtu ada menu play, seolah olah prototype yang lu desain bisa jadi kayak software yang udah jadi, nah cocok banget buat analist yang cm punya waktu sedikit, trs harus presentasi ke client. Rekomendasi bgt deh buat yang satu ini.. TOP.. AKU…PUAS….

* Buat Informasi Lebih lanjut , silahkan ke http://www.carettasoftware.com/

Owkeey.. dah.. itu senjata2 gw yang sering gw gunain,, thanks buat waktunya baca tulisan gw yang ga ada aturan..

-Adios-

phyton lady

narakinomoto — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 07:46:08 +0000

hoalaa…

wah wah,, dah lumayan lama ya,, ga sempet ng-post..

cos lumayan banyak halangan.. oke kali ini gw mau cerita tentang my “phyton lady” ..

binatang piaraan gw yang ada di rumah,, kalo kemarin si “eneng” yg di bahas.. kali ini.. si phyton lady yang kita bahas..

yup,, sebenernya piara dah dari kecil bgt.. waktu dy cm 1 meter.. phyton lady ini emang beda bgt sama phyton gw yang terdahulu.. yang sukses hidup smpe sepaha orang dewasa. phyton lady ga bisa makan sendiri alias harus di suapin..

well… nyuapin phyton.. hahaha…

Gila kali ya,, nyuapin Phyton.. hahhaha…tapi karena sayang sm si dya.. alhasil,, kami sekeluarga bisa membesarkannya sampai segede skrng.. asli.. makin Beraat aja…. )

Well,, skrng my-PhytonLady lagi bertapa alias lg ganti kulit, karena udh dari seminggu yg lalu di kasih makan,, saat ny dya tuk bertapa , supaya lebih besar lagi.. lebih bagus lagi kulitnya.. dan lebih bersinar kulitnya.. waaaw…

Sep sep sep… segitu aja,, cerita tentang my-PhytonLady.. Tq tq tq..

–Adios–

Cooliris Photos Wall… awsome..!!

narakinomoto — Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:31:30 +0000

Waaw.. waktu liat Cooliris, gw smpet bingung.. (ini apa yaa?? kok lucu yaa) dapet nice info ini dari “Bebong”, langsung deh gw menuju TKP,, yup.. TKP ny di sini (http://www.cooliris.com/) langsung deh nyoba nyoba, klik sana klik sini..

dan akhrnya bisa nempelin ini di Blog.. hihi..

Simpel, bgt buat share album yg ada di FB, Picasa, dll (bca sendiri,, cooliris support apa aja)

Okelah… sep.. manteb.. yg di atas itu.. album foto gw yang ada di FB…

–Adios–

narakinomoto — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:38:23 +0000

My Lucid

narakinomoto — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:28:26 +0000

Si Hitam yang Takut Air (Kucing Peliharaan gw)

narakinomoto — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:47:09 +0000

Yupp,, sempet terlintas pertanyaan, barusan pas gw liat kucing yg mojok aja di sudut tembok,, karena hujan turun lumayan deres,, nah.. kondisi kyk gini juga neh, yang bikin gw bertanya tanya,, kok sama ya kyk si eneng drumah.. dy juga paling males klo kena air,, bisa2 pergi kocar kacir,, klo di cipratin air..

Akhrnya gw mulai bertanya sama temen temen di ruangan kantor,, “guys,, knp ya?? kok kucing takut air..?? ” mereka malah jwb,, “knp emang?? pasti tebakan lucu neh”.. wait…??!! tingg nonng,,, gw nanya serius kok.. malah di bil tebak2an,, hahhahaha….

Mulai deh,, gw tanya sama yg Om Google,, yup… apa se yg dya ga tau..! hihi… nah, mulai deh gw dpt informasi knp seh,, kucing paling males klo kena Air.?? sebabnya adalah kucing itu paling males kalo suhu tubuhnya menurun, karena kedinginan.. tau sendiri deh,, klo air khn suhunya rendah.. makanya kucing berusaha untuk menjaga jangan sampe kena air,, klo kena air dan dya kedinginan selain susah buat ngeringin bulu bulu nya,, (beda ya , sama anjing yg tinggal ngibas2in doank badannya) dan kucing bisa mati kalo suhu tubuhnya bener2 drop bgt..

si eneng, kalo mandi harus pake air anget,, bisa bikin dya nyaman..dasar manja.

okelah,, berhubung bos dah manggil , ngajakin meeting.. sekian dulu ya… mmeeeooow….

-Adios-

my little kittens…

narakinomoto — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:09:22 +0000

Kenapa judul ny, kittens…

yupp,, gw mau sedikit cerita tentang binatang piaraan gw di rumah…

Kiita sekeluarga udah hampir 1 tahun, miara kucing anggora cewe,,nama : Eneng KOmaroneng warna nya full hitam smua nya.. “black cat” waw.. serem emang,, walaupun dy manja, tapi tetep aja ada efek efek misterius gtu… apalagi kali dya lagi tampang jutek,, (emang jutek mulu se tiap hari… )hahhaha.. nah,, emang udh dari 2 bulan yang lalu dy,, hamil.. (yang sebelumnya,, udh pernah ngalamin keguguran 1 kali.. karena dy lompat2an mulu,, emang rada2 ganjen dya)

dan,, pada akhrnya… tgl 13 Feb 2010.. dy melahirkan.. waaaaw…. seneng ny luar biasa… kayak ngerasa punya anak sendiri… hihi… sumpah.. kittens yg lucu lucu.. ada 4 ekor kittens 2 cewe 2 cowo… dengan bulu belang2 kyk macan, warna putih2nyy dan warna kuning sediikit.. kok ga ada yg warna hitam pekat kyk si induk,, kemungkinan. ini gen dr bokapnya, tapi karena proses persalinan yang ga sempurna, ada salah satu kitten yang kaki ny patah, karena kebelit ari2.., sedih bgt deh dy njerit2 kesakitan trs.. (merinding bgt, pas denger nya)

Tapi kebahagiaan gw,, cm sesaat… semua berubah jadi kondisi yang sangat2 di luar perkiraan…eneng super duper cuek sm anak anak ny,,jiwa keibuannya ga muncul sama sekali, mungkin karena baru pertama kali ngelahirin, bayangin dya ga mau meluk anak anaknya yang kedinginan , apalagi ngasih susu.. waw…

Stress , bingung, n feel so bad.. mulai menghantui… kekhawatiran gw bener bener terjadi.. eneng malah galak pas di deketin anak anak nya…waw… gw n adek2 gw,, smpe kebingungan..kita coba bantu nyari puting susu si eneng, trs kasih ke anak2nya.. cuma 2 ekor yang berhasil nyusu.. dan akhrnya,, 2 yang lain meninggal pas hari ke 2 setelah dilahirkan.. hiks..hiks…

gw masih berharap, sisa nya masih bisa bertahan hidup..tapi pupus harapan gw, pas gw liat tdi pagi,, 2 ekor lagi tergeletak tak bernyawa… totally sad.. bener2 ga enak bgt rasanya… walaupun belum di kasih nama, tetep aja gw sedih,, hal ini juga yg bikin gw ga mood ngapain2n hari ini,, lemes aja..hawanya…

Yaa,, pointnya adalah ga enak bgt ya,, klo keilangan sesuatu yang udh kita sayangin,, walupun dengan waktu yang cuma sebentar.. dan hikmahnya.. buat pengalaman gw n eneng juga ke depan nya.. semoga bisa lebih siap lagi.. okey,, gw dah lumayan refresh.. back to work

finally all died, four kittens fly back into space :so sad

-Adios-

Long Road To The Future

narakinomoto — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:54:29 +0000

Long Road To The Future..

Berat abis , kata di atas.. tapi ya emang hal itu yg gw rasain sekarang.. hmm…. ternyata susah gila perjuangannya.. kadang gw mikir,, apa se yang gw cari..?? kerja doank mah ga cukup.. klo ga punya skiill n network yang capcus.. terus mau mulai dari mana?? Skill or Network…?? yaaah,, mungkin emang udh waktunya gw bangkit, kadang klo lagi putus asa, beuuuh… ngeri ny bukan main,, ya walaupun belum sampe bunuh diri.. wkwkw…

Yang gw khawatirin itu, gw takut ga bisa manfaatin kehidupan gw yang cuma sesaat (beeuh,, bahasanya baku amat, kayak di buku B.Indo anak SD) serius….serius….!! ^^,

Makanya gw mutusin,, buat mulai dari sekarang.. balik lagi kayak dulu..mang dulu kayak gimana see?? wkwkw.. yang pasti lebih baik dari sekarang.. dimulai dengan waktu.. yupp.. must be a time keeper.. ( ya jujur aja,, masalah manusia itu ya,, M.A.L.E.S.SSSS..S.S.Ssssss) bakalan susah kalo bgtu.. hihi… dengan semangat baru.. Niat Petarung sejati.. untuk kehidupan yang lebih baik… wkwkwk….

Yoi.. smanggaat… Teman.. Semanggat.. Semua harus di atur dan di capai..!!!

Nah,, Itu baru Nara.. sepp lah .. kita mulai petualangan ini.. Lets The Show…

-Adios-

My Lovely Boo

narakinomoto — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:13:24 +0000